(2) The
second part of the "Formal
Charges" was the information about a State employee
involved in the enforcement process who filed his own
"Friend of the Court"
Brief supposedly on behalf of the appointed board - when the
Board obviously was never informed, asked for permission, or
approved any such action.
There was so
much written material submitted, and there were twenty-one (21)
Board members, plus staff, that I put the whole report on a
CD. If you want one click
here. As
this is the second article in a series of upcoming articles, you
may want to get one so you can follow along.
What was the point?
The point was
that despite the actions of the
"Enforcement Monitor,"
and the lengthy report generated, care must be taken to
CONSTANTLY MONITOR the actions of the enforcement staff - or
they'll obviously go right back off on their own once again.
The appointed
Board made a motion requiring the staff to agendize this issue
for the next meeting. I'll be there, as will others, to deal
with this issue.
If you want to be there, too, click
HERE to send us an email and we'll keep you updated.
In health care
"constant vigilance"
is the answer.
Stay tuned...
Tim Bolen -
Consumer Advocate
